<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rich Client Vs. Web: User interface</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.leenarts.net/2006/08/22/rich-client-vs-web-user-interface/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.leenarts.net/2006/08/22/rich-client-vs-web-user-interface/</link>
	<description>Macs, Java, software development, IT related books and things I do for a living.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:32:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeroen</title>
		<link>http://blog.leenarts.net/2006/08/22/rich-client-vs-web-user-interface/comment-page-1/#comment-78415</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeroen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 07:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.leenarts.net/2006/08/22/rich-client-vs-web-user-interface/#comment-78415</guid>
		<description>While Spring offers all kinds of libraries and related stuff, it still is just a layer over the underlying Swing framework. While you could say that NetBeans and Eclipse RCP are layers on top of Swing and SWT. Spring Rich Client is not as full featured (yet?) as NetBeans or Eclipse RCP.

I think of Spring Rich more as a support library supporting certain aspects of UI development, but not a full fledged Rich Client Platform. Therefor, I tend to group Spring Rich as yet another Swing support library. In the list I provided in this post Spring Rich would be grouped under Swing/SWT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Spring offers all kinds of libraries and related stuff, it still is just a layer over the underlying Swing framework. While you could say that NetBeans and Eclipse RCP are layers on top of Swing and SWT. Spring Rich Client is not as full featured (yet?) as NetBeans or Eclipse RCP.</p>
<p>I think of Spring Rich more as a support library supporting certain aspects of UI development, but not a full fledged Rich Client Platform. Therefor, I tend to group Spring Rich as yet another Swing support library. In the list I provided in this post Spring Rich would be grouped under Swing/SWT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Karich</title>
		<link>http://blog.leenarts.net/2006/08/22/rich-client-vs-web-user-interface/comment-page-1/#comment-78377</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Karich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 08:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.leenarts.net/2006/08/22/rich-client-vs-web-user-interface/#comment-78377</guid>
		<description>There is even another choice: spring rich client!
http://karussell.wordpress.com/2009/03/21/spring-rich-client-links/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is even another choice: spring rich client!<br />
<a href="http://karussell.wordpress.com/2009/03/21/spring-rich-client-links/" rel="nofollow">http://karussell.wordpress.com/2009/03/21/spring-rich-client-links/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

